Sapio AI LogoSapio AI
    AI Safety•14 min read

    Filling the Gaps: Knowledge Gap Analysis as the Missing Link in Trustworthy LLMs

    By Sapio AI Team•

    The Trust Problem

    Even high-performing LLMs can produce fluent, confident, but false outputs — known as hallucinations. These often trace back to missing or insufficient knowledge, not model intent. Knowledge gap analysis directly targets that issue.

    What It Is and Why It Matters

    Knowledge gap analysis is a structured way of identifying factual weaknesses in a model. These gaps might relate to company-specific policies, local regulations, product specs, or fast-changing events.

    The key is to pinpoint where the model is prone to bluff — and to fill or mitigate those blind spots.

    Core Techniques

    Gap analysis methods include:

    • Probing with structured questions from known data sources
    • Testing answer consistency across varied prompt phrasing
    • Comparing model answers across different systems
    • Examining token-level confidence (logprobs) for signals of uncertainty
    • Routing low-confidence or anomalous answers to human review

    No method is perfect alone, but combined they give enterprises a much clearer map of where the model is unqualified to answer.

    Enterprise Applications

    For customer support, gap audits reveal areas where the AI might fabricate answers. In legal and compliance, it helps spot regulatory omissions. For product copilots, it ensures models don't suggest outdated features or incorrect pricing.

    Why This Is Different from Traditional Evals

    Evals ask, "Did the model pass the test we gave it?" Gap analysis asks, "What tests are we not even running that we should be?" This distinction is key for high-stakes environments.

    When to Use It

    Knowledge gap analysis is useful pre-deployment to certify models, post-incident to diagnose failures, and as an ongoing practice for evolving data contexts.

    Example in Practice

    A fintech chatbot offered tax advice that turned out to be inaccurate. Auditing revealed the model had zero training exposure to that tax domain. Once fixed with targeted retrieval and escalation rules, the issue was resolved.

    Key Takeaway

    Gap analysis moves teams from reactive to proactive. It shows what the model lacks — and helps teams fix it before the user finds out the hard way.